Secret/Usual [priority]
Bonn, 27 October 1989
Today I had a long talk with Wolfgang MischnickWolfgang Mischnick
Chairman of the
FDPFreie Demokratische Partei (Free Democratic Party) faction in the Bundestag of the
FRGFederal Republic of Germany 1968–1991.
, the chairman of
the FDPFreie Demokratische Partei (Free Democratic Party) faction. Mischnick returned 48 hours ago from a visit to East Berlin and was
in fact the first Western politician to meet with Egon KrenzEgon Krenz
General Secretary of the
SEDSozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands (Socialist Unity Party of Germany) 18.10.1989–3.12.1989 and Chairman of the
GDRGerman Democratic Republic State Council 18.10.1989–6.12.1989.
and the East German leadership.
In interviews with the media he spoke of his optimistic impressions with regard to
expected developments in East Germany.
When talking to me, he admitted that he had taken this line not so much because he
believes it is actually correct, but because he tends to believe that in this case
impressions and public reports about them can influence the process. His impression
is that there is indeed an atmosphere of change and a strong expectation [of it] among the public, but in private he would not dare to
predict that this atmosphere of change will become reality.
He mentioned that Krenz and GorbachevMikhail Gorbachev
General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union 11.3.1985–24.8.1991, Chairman of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union 25.5.1989–15.3.1990 and President of the Soviet Union 15.3.1990–25.12.1991.
had studied at around the same time at the
senior Party college in Moscow, and it is not impossible that this will influence
Krenz. He emphasized repeatedly that in the USSRUnion of Soviet Socialist Republics change is coming from the top down,
whereas in East Germany it is coming from below. It is being adopted – even if only
partially – by the local functionaries who are trying to pass it up the line, but it
is not certain to what extent this will go through. In his opinion a process like
that taking place in Hungary or Poland is not to be expected, due to the significant
difference caused by the German aspect.
First, [concerning] the justification for the existence of
a second German state if it is not socialist and second – the question of a possible
reunification.
I told him about the Israeli-Jewiss dilemma with regard to East Germany, especially
that country’s unwillingness to relate to its past. I also described the traditional
hostility of East Germany towards Israel and its unsuccessful efforts to gain support
in the U.S.United States by displaying a seemingly positive attitude to the restoration of a
cemetery and a synagogue and the employment of a rabbi for the tiny Jewish community
in East Berlin. He told me that at the end of January 1990 he would visit East
Germany at the head of an FDPFreie Demokratische Partei (Free Democratic Party) party delegation and we agreed that we would discuss
the latter subject before he leaves.